The headline of this inane blog post by Stanley Fish (but I repeat myself) asks: "Are There Secular Reasons?"
Paul Gowder has the correct answer: "I sure hope so. Because otherwise there aren’t any reasons at all."
« Base Alchemy | Main | More on Stewart Baker »
March 08, 2010
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c8b8a53ef01310f7b4b32970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Reasons:
Comments
Recent Comments
- mark on Like Napoleon. Only Nice. And a Bit Taller.
- London Counselling on Socratic Metaskepticism
- Dominic Caraccilo on The FPD's TGIF Roundup
- Michael Drake on "Carmageddon" My Ass
- Paul Gowder on "Carmageddon" My Ass
- Michael M. on The Universal Apologetic
- enigMan on The Universal Apologetic
- seth edenbaum on The Universal Apologetic
- mark on The Unbearable Lightness of Talk About Being
- Michael Drake on Nudge Nudge
Embalmed Ones (Blogs of Yore)
Fabulous
Those Drawn with a Very Fine Camel Hair Brush
Those Having Just Broken a Water Pitcher
Those Trembling as if Mad
Stray Dogs
Those That from a Distance Resemble Flies
Those Included in the Present Classification
- Antimeta
- Brain Pains
- Brains
- Cliché Reality
- Conscious Entities
- de crapulas edormiendo
- fragments of consciousness
- Huenemanniac
- Ideas of Imperfection
- Leiter Reports
- LogBlog
- Logic and Language
- Obscure and Confused Ideas
- Pain for Philosophers
- PEA Soup
- Philosophy Talk
- Prosblogion
- The Ends of Thought
- The Ethical Werewolf
- The Garden of Forking Paths
- The Splintered Mind
- The Uncredible Hallq
- Think Tonk
- Uncommon Priors
- WMD
- wo's weblog
